Residential Child Care
Arkansas Sheriffs' Youth Ranches, Inc.
Director: Mr. Thomas Mike Cumnock
Address: 100 St. Vincent Place, Batesville, AR 72501 • Phone: 870-793-6841 • Website: http://www.youthranches.com
|
|
Volunteers
Volunteers per month: 23
Volunteers are trained:
Volunteers are actively recruited:
Program Mission Statement:
(self-reported)
Our purpose is to provide loving care with therapuetic intervention, because we believe "it is better to build a child than to repair an adult." The Ranches create and/or support an array of services which guarantees no child will be left behind in Arkansas and to provide our children the birthright of every child - the right to health care, educational opportunities, a safe home, and a loving environment with people who care for/about them.
Score Summary
| Overall Score: | Excellent |
| Practice Principles: | Better |
| Faith Related Elements: | Excellent |
| Outcome Measures: | Excellent |
| Change Process: | Excellent |
Program Facts
- Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 43
- Program Participants Last Year: 118
- Meets about 123 time(s) with each participant per month
- Participants remain in the program for 53 months
Board Activities
Funding Overview
(self-reported)
| This Program | This Organization | |
|---|---|---|
|
Organization Budget: $4,300,000 Program Budget: $1,890,789 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 7% | 7% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 1% | 7% |
| Individual Gifts | 65% | 60% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 24% | 23% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 3% | 3% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 0% | 0% |
| Other | 0% | 0% |
Average Program Funding From All Samaritan Programs |
Average Organization Funding From All Samaritan Organizations |
|
|
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison. Average Organization Budget: $3,817,897 Average Program Budget: $480,643 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Foundation Grants | 24% | 18% |
| Government Grants/Contracts | 3% | 8% |
| Individual Gifts | 36% | 33% |
| Business/Corporate Gifts | 9% | 8% |
| Congregation/Denominational Gifts | 9% | 10% |
| Dues/Fees/Income | 7% | 9% |
| Other | 10% | 11% |
It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.
Score Details
Program Focus |
||
|---|---|---|
| Program Mission | Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. | Good |
| Target Population | Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. | Excellent |
| Eligibility Criteria | Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. | Excellent |
| Program Requirements | Well defined requirements for client participation. | Excellent |
| Referrals From Other Organizations | Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. | Excellent |
| Referrals to Other Organizations | Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? | Excellent |
| Volunteer to Staff Ratio | Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? | Good |
| Past Participant Recruiting | Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? | Excellent |
Evaluation and Practice Princples |
||
| Practice Principles | How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. | Better |
| Outcome Measurement | The ability to measure stated program outcomes. | Excellent |
| Change Process | Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. | Excellent |
| Faith Related Elements | Integration of faith related elements. | Excellent |
| Measurement Frequency | Frequency of measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
| Program Evaluation | Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. | Excellent |
Institutional Stability |
||
| Organization Age | A measure of the organization's durability. | Excellent |
| Board Oversight | How involved in the program are the members of its board? | Excellent |
| Program Duration | Average duration of a clients participation with a program. | Excellent |
Finances |
||
| Budget Diffusion | Diversity of the programs funding sources. | Good |
| Government Funding | Does this program accept little or no government funding? | Excellent |
Program Score Details
Graph Key
| 1st Standard Deviation | |
| 2nd Standard Deviation | |
| Mean | |
| This Organization | |
| Other Organizations |
Overall Score

| Average Score: | 18.2 | Maximum Score: | 26.2 |
| Std. Deviation: | 3.4 | Minimum Score: | 6.0 |
| This Program: | 23.8 |
Faith Factors

| Average Score: | 29.2 | Maximum Score: | 60.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 19.0 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 49.0 |
Practice Principles

| Average Score: | 115.2 | Maximum Score: | 149.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 24.9 | Minimum Score: | 10.0 |
| This Program: | 128.0 |
Outcome Measures

| Average Score: | 2.3 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.8 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 3.0 |
Change Processes

| Average Score: | 2.1 | Maximum Score: | 3.0 |
| Std. Deviation: | 0.6 | Minimum Score: | 0.0 |
| This Program: | 2.5 |
Outcomes & Measures:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.
Outcome 1: Values Medical Maintanence and Preventive Care
Measure Used:
All children are given a Pre test/Post test Evaluation on developmental assets. Ongoing regular meetings are held to determine the active case plan/treatment plan for each child. The case plan records the progress in various life areas or noted by the participant as well as staff, education personnel, community partners, and volunteers. The plan shows progress towards (or away from) in each of the goals identified for a particular participant.
1. actively participates in regular medical, dental, vision, and mental health services
2. takes responsibility for planning for future participation in their services
Outcome 2: Achieved Educational Goals and/or Educational Potential
Measure Used:
All children are given a Pre test/Post test Evaluation on developmental assets. Ongoing regular meetings are held to determine the active case plan/treatment plan for each child. The case plan records the progress in various life areas or noted by the participant as well as staff, education personnel, community partners, and volunteers. The plan shows progress towards (or away from) in each of the goals identified for a particular participant.
1. Daily attendance in public school
2. actively participates in ASYR tutorial program
3. completes high school
4. creates a postsecondary education plan (college, trade school, job training, etc.)
5. follows through with post secondary education plan
Outcome 3: Socially Competent
Measure Used:
All children are given a Pre test/Post test Evaluation on developmental assets. Ongoing regular meetings are held to determine the active case plan/treatment plan for each child. The case plan records the progress in various life areas or noted by the participant as well as staff, education personnel, community partners, and volunteers. The plan shows progress towards (or away from) in each of the goals identified for a particular participant.
1. demonstrates improved planning and decision making
2. demonstrates empathy, sensitivity, and interpersonal skills
3. comfortable with people of different cultural, racial, and/or ethnic backgrounds
4. reduced participation in high-risk behaviors (alcohol/substance abuse, violence, and inappropriate sexual activity)
5. demonstrates conflict resolution
5. integration of high expectations
Outcome 4: Achieved Postive Identity
Measure Used:
All children are given a Pre test/Post test Evaluation on developmental assets. Ongoing regular meetings are held to determine the active case plan/treatment plan for each child. The case plan records the progress in various life areas or noted by the participant as well as staff, education personnel, community partners, and volunteers. The plan shows progress towards (or away from) in each of the goals identified for a particular participant.
1. reports of higher self-esteem
2. She/he has a sense of purpose
3. she/he has a positive view of his/her future
4. gaining increasingly more control over his/her personal outcomes
5. shows restraint
Outcome 5: Active Participant in his/her Community
Measure Used:
All children are given a Pre test/Post test Evaluation on developmental assets. Ongoing regular meetings are held to determine the active case plan/treatment plan for each child. The case plan records the progress in various life areas or noted by the participant as well as staff, education personnel, community partners, and volunteers. The plan shows progress towards (or away from) in each of the goals identified for a particular participant.
1. values helping others
2. actively engaged in life long learning
3. actively participates in youth programs
4. actively involved with religious community of his/her choice
5. involved in creative activities (music, theater, arts, etc..)
Change Process:
(self-reported)
Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.
Before admission our residents have been neglected, abused, and provided little or no medical care. After arriving they receive medical, dental, vision, hearing, preventive care, and mental health services. They learn the importance of medical care and prevention and that they are worthy of the expense. They take increasing responsibility for their own care.
Children arrive with low self esteem since their abusers have stolen it. They enter a healing community where they are encouraged to believe in themselves, learn appropriate social behaviors, and participate in social activities. (Example: one child who was living in a tent came to the Ranch, she knew nothing about hygiene. One year later, she won a beauty pageant.)
Many children came from houses where education has no value. They were mobile, had high absenteeism, and low grades. The Ranch has mandatory school and tutoring attendance with many “fun” academic activities. The children realize that a good education is critical and the Ranch helps secure educational scholarships for them.
Our children come from neighborhoods where they avoided authority and tried to not be noticed. At the Ranch they participate in community activities, and start to give back. They have become active with the volunteer fire department, community theatre, and in their church communities. When our community had evacuees from Katrina, our children sent cards, raised money, and served food to them.
Our children move from being victims of abuse, neglect, and abandonment to survivors, to thriving as productive valuable human beings.
End Notes
Incomplete Applications
Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.
Relative Scoring
Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.
Additional Reference Material
More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.
Acton Institute Relationship
The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.
Instructions
This page contains a program summary and scorecard formatted for your printer.
Click the Print link below or select "Print" from your browser's menu.



