The Samaritan Award
Applied in 2007

Residential Child Care

Arkansas Sheriffs' Youth Ranches, Inc.

Director: Mr. Thomas Mike Cumnock
Address: 100 St. Vincent Place, Batesville, AR 72501 • Phone: 870-793-6841 • Website: http://www.youthranches.com

Scores compared to other programs that applied in 2007
Score Summary
red Range of scores
blue Average score
green This organization's score

Volunteers

Volunteers per month: 23

Volunteers are trained:

Volunteer Training
AlwaysRarely

Volunteers are actively recruited:

Volunteer Recruiting
AlwaysRarely

Program Mission Statement:

(self-reported)

Our purpose is to provide loving care with therapuetic intervention, because we believe "it is better to build a child than to repair an adult." The Ranches create and/or support an array of services which guarantees no child will be left behind in Arkansas and to provide our children the birthright of every child - the right to health care, educational opportunities, a safe home, and a loving environment with people who care for/about them.

Score Summary

Overall Score: Excellent
Practice Principles: Better
Faith Related Elements: Excellent
Outcome Measures: Excellent
Change Process: Excellent

Program Facts

  • Paid (FTE) Staff Working: 43
  • Program Participants Last Year: 118
  • Meets about 123 time(s) with each participant per month
  • Participants remain in the program for 53 months

Board Activities

Check
Formally reviews the performance of the chief executive officer at least once every two years.
Check
Formally approves the budget.
Check
Ensures that arrangements with outside fund raising firms are made in writing.
Check
Receives information about the financial arrangements with such firms and, if applicable, the anticipated portion of the gross proceeds that goes to the organization.
Check
Has formally approved a conflict of interest policy and regularly monitors it to ensure adherence.
Check
Receives, at least quarterly, the organization's financial statement.
Check
Receives, at least annually, an auditor's management letter and report.
Check
Convenes an audit committee.
Samaritan Award Report - Funding Overview

Funding Overview

(self-reported)

This Program This Organization
Organization Budget: $4,300,000
Program Budget: $1,890,789
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
7% 7%
Government Grants/Contracts
1% 7%
Individual Gifts
65% 60%
Business/Corporate Gifts
24% 23%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
3% 3%
Dues/Fees/Income
0% 0%
Other
0% 0%

Average Program Funding
From All Samaritan Programs

Average Organization Funding
From All Samaritan Organizations
The next charts display the average funding sources for all programs currently in the Samaritan Guide for your comparison.

Average Organization Budget: $3,817,897
Average Program Budget: $480,643
Program Funding Organization Funding
Foundation Grants
24% 18%
Government Grants/Contracts
3% 8%
Individual Gifts
36% 33%
Business/Corporate Gifts
9% 8%
Congregation/Denominational Gifts
9% 10%
Dues/Fees/Income
7% 9%
Other
10% 11%

It is important to maintain diverse income sources for your programs and for your oganization as a whole. Doing so provides long-term financial stability to your organizations and programs. It is also important to note that government funding often comes with stipulations and restrictions. More information is available in the Raising Resources Toolkit - pdf.

Samaritan Award Report - Score Detail

Score Details

Program Focus

Program Mission Clarity and specificity of the program's mission statement. Good
Target Population Clarity and specificity of the programs target clientele. Excellent
Eligibility Criteria Clarity and specificity of the program's eligibility criteria. Excellent
Program Requirements Well defined requirements for client participation. Excellent
Referrals From Other Organizations Do other organizations recommend this program to their clientele. Excellent
Referrals to Other Organizations Does this program recommend other programs to their clients? Excellent
Volunteer to Staff Ratio Are volunteers effectively incorporated into the program? Good
Past Participant Recruiting Are past program participants recruited as volunteers? Excellent

Evaluation and Practice Princples

Practice Principles How supports and resources are provided to increase outcomes. Better
Outcome Measurement The ability to measure stated program outcomes. Excellent
Change Process Specific and measurable statement of the program's goals. Excellent
Faith Related Elements Integration of faith related elements. Excellent
Measurement Frequency Frequency of measuring client outcomes. Excellent
Program Evaluation Level of the budget allocated to measuring client outcomes. Excellent

Institutional Stability

Organization Age A measure of the organization's durability. Excellent
Board Oversight How involved in the program are the members of its board? Excellent
Program Duration Average duration of a clients participation with a program. Excellent

Finances

Budget Diffusion Diversity of the programs funding sources. Good
Government Funding Does this program accept little or no government funding? Excellent
Samaritan Award Report - Program Score Details

Program Score Details

Graph Key

1st Standard Deviation
2nd Standard Deviation
Mean
This Organization
Other Organizations

Overall Score

Average Score: 18.2 Maximum Score: 26.2
Std. Deviation: 3.4 Minimum Score: 6.0
This Program: 23.8

Faith Factors

Average Score: 29.2 Maximum Score: 60.0
Std. Deviation: 19.0 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 49.0

Practice Principles

Average Score: 115.2 Maximum Score: 149.0
Std. Deviation: 24.9 Minimum Score: 10.0
This Program: 128.0

Outcome Measures

Average Score: 2.3 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.8 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 3.0

Change Processes

Average Score: 2.1 Maximum Score: 3.0
Std. Deviation: 0.6 Minimum Score: 0.0
This Program: 2.5
Samaritan Award Report - Outcomes & Measures

Outcomes & Measures:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide at least three clear and specific outcomes with corresponding measures in which a relationship is shown between outcomes and measures.

Outcome 1: Values Medical Maintanence and Preventive Care

Measure Used:
All children are given a Pre test/Post test Evaluation on developmental assets. Ongoing regular meetings are held to determine the active case plan/treatment plan for each child. The case plan records the progress in various life areas or noted by the participant as well as staff, education personnel, community partners, and volunteers. The plan shows progress towards (or away from) in each of the goals identified for a particular participant.

1. actively participates in regular medical, dental, vision, and mental health services

2. takes responsibility for planning for future participation in their services


Outcome 2: Achieved Educational Goals and/or Educational Potential

Measure Used:
All children are given a Pre test/Post test Evaluation on developmental assets. Ongoing regular meetings are held to determine the active case plan/treatment plan for each child. The case plan records the progress in various life areas or noted by the participant as well as staff, education personnel, community partners, and volunteers. The plan shows progress towards (or away from) in each of the goals identified for a particular participant.

1. Daily attendance in public school

2. actively participates in ASYR tutorial program

3. completes high school

4. creates a postsecondary education plan (college, trade school, job training, etc.)

5. follows through with post secondary education plan


Outcome 3: Socially Competent

Measure Used:
All children are given a Pre test/Post test Evaluation on developmental assets. Ongoing regular meetings are held to determine the active case plan/treatment plan for each child. The case plan records the progress in various life areas or noted by the participant as well as staff, education personnel, community partners, and volunteers. The plan shows progress towards (or away from) in each of the goals identified for a particular participant.

1. demonstrates improved planning and decision making

2. demonstrates empathy, sensitivity, and interpersonal skills

3. comfortable with people of different cultural, racial, and/or ethnic backgrounds

4. reduced participation in high-risk behaviors (alcohol/substance abuse, violence, and inappropriate sexual activity)

5. demonstrates conflict resolution

5. integration of high expectations


Outcome 4: Achieved Postive Identity

Measure Used:
All children are given a Pre test/Post test Evaluation on developmental assets. Ongoing regular meetings are held to determine the active case plan/treatment plan for each child. The case plan records the progress in various life areas or noted by the participant as well as staff, education personnel, community partners, and volunteers. The plan shows progress towards (or away from) in each of the goals identified for a particular participant.

1. reports of higher self-esteem

2. She/he has a sense of purpose

3. she/he has a positive view of his/her future

4. gaining increasingly more control over his/her personal outcomes

5. shows restraint


Outcome 5: Active Participant in his/her Community

Measure Used:
All children are given a Pre test/Post test Evaluation on developmental assets. Ongoing regular meetings are held to determine the active case plan/treatment plan for each child. The case plan records the progress in various life areas or noted by the participant as well as staff, education personnel, community partners, and volunteers. The plan shows progress towards (or away from) in each of the goals identified for a particular participant.

1. values helping others

2. actively engaged in life long learning

3. actively participates in youth programs

4. actively involved with religious community of his/her choice

5. involved in creative activities (music, theater, arts, etc..)


Samaritan Award Report - Change Process

Change Process:

(self-reported)

Scoring for this section is based on the organizations ability to provide clear, measurable, client-focused stages of change based on participant participation.

Before admission our residents have been neglected, abused, and provided little or no medical care. After arriving they receive medical, dental, vision, hearing, preventive care, and mental health services. They learn the importance of medical care and prevention and that they are worthy of the expense. They take increasing responsibility for their own care.

Children arrive with low self esteem since their abusers have stolen it. They enter a healing community where they are encouraged to believe in themselves, learn appropriate social behaviors, and participate in social activities. (Example: one child who was living in a tent came to the Ranch, she knew nothing about hygiene. One year later, she won a beauty pageant.)

Many children came from houses where education has no value. They were mobile, had high absenteeism, and low grades. The Ranch has mandatory school and tutoring attendance with many “fun” academic activities. The children realize that a good education is critical and the Ranch helps secure educational scholarships for them.

Our children come from neighborhoods where they avoided authority and tried to not be noticed. At the Ranch they participate in community activities, and start to give back. They have become active with the volunteer fire department, community theatre, and in their church communities. When our community had evacuees from Katrina, our children sent cards, raised money, and served food to them.

Our children move from being victims of abuse, neglect, and abandonment to survivors, to thriving as productive valuable human beings.

Samaritan Award Report - End Notes

End Notes

Incomplete Applications

Significant decreases in certain scores may indicate failure to comprehensively complete certain sections of the Samaritan Award application. Please be sure to fill out every question in the Samaritan Award application.

Relative Scoring

Total program scores are partially computed against other programs from within the same pool of applications and so are not cumulative.

Additional Reference Material

More information on scoring and methodology may be found on the Samaritan Guide and Award website.

Acton Institute Relationship

The Samaritan Guide and Samaritan Award are projects run by the Acton Institute. Inclusion in the Guide does not signify endorsement by the Acton Institute. More information on why the Acton Institute runs this project is available online.